- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Regarding the Chavis contract...
Posted on 12/17/15 at 4:44 pm to Pax Regis
Posted on 12/17/15 at 4:44 pm to Pax Regis
quote:
That's not just a clarification. It adds sixty days to the buyout term. It's shady at best.
No, it's clarification. The original wording does not explicitly exclude the 36th and 24th months. It was ambiguous, hence the change for clarity.
1
Posted on 12/17/15 at 7:36 pm to GRTiger
quote:
No, it's clarification.
Yes, it's a clarification, but doing so acknowledges and validates an alternative interpretation. This thing is going to come down to whether or not Chavis did something prior to Jan 1 to make him liable. LSU knows this and that's why they want his phone records. Otherwise the shite he did in Jan would have made this a slam dunk.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News