Started By
Message

re: Statistically, Cam is nowhere near the MVP

Posted on 12/14/15 at 5:10 pm to
Posted by TigerBait1127
Houston
Member since Jun 2005
47336 posts
Posted on 12/14/15 at 5:10 pm to
I was trolling.

And I know they stink, but it's also dishonest when people act like Olsen isn't a receiving threat.

Offensive line is a lot more important than receivers imo
Posted by beatbammer
Member since Sep 2010
38161 posts
Posted on 12/14/15 at 5:18 pm to
quote:

Offensive line is a lot more important than receivers imo


You mean the Michael Oher/UDFA/Ryan Kalil/3rd round draft choice/UDFA OL Carolina is using?
Posted by TheSexecutioner
Member since Mar 2011
5258 posts
Posted on 12/16/15 at 1:42 pm to
quote:

And I know they stink, but it's also dishonest when people act like Olsen isn't a receiving threat.


No more so than people acting like Matthew Dellavadova isn't a scoring threat. He is a horrible #1 target by NFL standards. Absolutely awful.

In his 4 years with the Bears, he never had more than 612 yards. That's absolutely horrible for a number 1 target. Permissible for a tight end if he isn't their best reciever. But the problem is his mediocre 4 years with the Bears was worlds better than the 5 years Cam's top WR(Ginn) played with other teams.

Nobody disagrees that Greg Olsen should be in the league contributing as a 3rd or 4th target on a good team, or that Tedd Ginn could MAYBE find a roll on a roster as a backup that you hope you never have to use. That isn't how they are being used.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram