Started By
Message

re: Statistically, Cam is nowhere near the MVP

Posted on 12/14/15 at 1:50 pm to
Posted by TigerBait1127
Houston
Member since Jun 2005
47336 posts
Posted on 12/14/15 at 1:50 pm to
quote:

Oh my god they won 38-0 and were up 21 in the first quarter. It's not like they won 3-0 or 10-0 with a defensive touchdown.


I literally said it was an idiotic argument and you went on a rant

quote:

What about the Seattle, Green Bay, and Saints games? The defense sure didn't shut the other team out.


ok? Who has said he hasn't played well this year?

Glad to see that your only criteria is Wins

Oh and the Carolina D forced 5 turnovers in those games.

Seattle only scored 23 points. Cam had 2 interceptions too in Carolina territory.

If that is your definition of bad defense
Posted by apfour21
New Orleans, LA
Member since Nov 2012
3143 posts
Posted on 12/14/15 at 1:59 pm to
How is it an idiotic argument when you are talking value to the team? Having a tight end like Gronk changes the way the entire defense plays. The Patriots are a different team without him. His value is not just straight stats just like a qb like Cam's value is not just stats.

And should having a good defense disqualify you from being MVP? When you are talking about value to a team having a quarterback like Cam effects the entire team.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram