- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Race baiting student put in her place again by Supreme Court
Posted on 12/13/15 at 6:40 pm to Turbeauxdog
Posted on 12/13/15 at 6:40 pm to Turbeauxdog
quote:
My point stands immaterially contested by your link.
Yet again,
quote:
Of the 841 students admitted under these criteria, 47 had worse AI/PAI scores (a combination of the holistic measure, grades, and test scores) than Fisher, and [b]42 of them were white. On the other end, UT rejected 168 black and Latino students with scores equal to or better than Fisher’s.[/b]
Her case that she was not chosen because of her race does not appear hold water. So said two Texas course, including their COurt of Appeals x 2
This post was edited on 12/13/15 at 6:41 pm
2
Posted on 12/13/15 at 6:59 pm to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
AI/PAI
Yet again. Whatever this score is considers characteristics like race, which is of course the point of the suit, so the "scores" are not the "scores" referenced by salon.
Are you seriously leveraging your argument on scoring that considers race when arguing that race did not impact this woman's application?
Posted on 12/13/15 at 9:32 pm to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
that she was not chosen because of her race does not appear hold water. So said two Texas course, including their COurt of Appeals x 2
You can't possibly be trying to claim that the opinion of a few buffoons in black bath robes holds water in a debate of any substance.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News