- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: I just now finished the Serial podcast
Posted on 9/23/15 at 11:26 am to Tiger Voodoo
Posted on 9/23/15 at 11:26 am to Tiger Voodoo
quote:The same could be said for putting faith in the prosecutor, especially when that prosecutor is shown to be dishonest.
I am simply pointing out the dangers of putting complete faith in a podcast that had a clear end game in mind and constructed a narrative to fit that conclusion.
Posted on 9/23/15 at 11:35 am to buckeye_vol
Of course, the check on that which the system accounts for is the defense attorney that is paid to dissect the state's case, and present her own.
The podcast has no such built in check.
Now, I understand there is a claim that the defense attorney was not competent in her defense of Adnan. That will be decided by the appellate court. I predict, for the first time in this thread, that ineffective assistance of counsel will NOT be found. I actually think she was a bulldog in her cross examination, no matter how insufferable her voice was , and suspect there were reasons for not putting certain witnesses on the stand that we don't know about from Serial. It is a strategic decision that she would have made after judging the witnesses and their credibility and reliability in her own professional expertise.
Whatever issues arise later in her career, she was a respected and feared defender in her day.
It would be an easy out for the panel, though, if they just want it off their plate without the backlash of the Serial drones. The attorney is dead, so they wouldn't even have to offend or hang a fellow member of the Bar out to dry to do so.
It will be interesting to watch this all play out, for sure.
The podcast has no such built in check.
Now, I understand there is a claim that the defense attorney was not competent in her defense of Adnan. That will be decided by the appellate court. I predict, for the first time in this thread, that ineffective assistance of counsel will NOT be found. I actually think she was a bulldog in her cross examination, no matter how insufferable her voice was , and suspect there were reasons for not putting certain witnesses on the stand that we don't know about from Serial. It is a strategic decision that she would have made after judging the witnesses and their credibility and reliability in her own professional expertise.
Whatever issues arise later in her career, she was a respected and feared defender in her day.
It would be an easy out for the panel, though, if they just want it off their plate without the backlash of the Serial drones. The attorney is dead, so they wouldn't even have to offend or hang a fellow member of the Bar out to dry to do so.
It will be interesting to watch this all play out, for sure.
This post was edited on 9/23/15 at 11:39 am
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News