So far yall dumb bastards have no better ideas. Just "full retard" comments. Yall just forfeiting the season or do you think McCown can actually do anything until Brees returns. Lets hear something better or shove every word youre thinking about typing right back up your backdoor.

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by Rand AlThor

Member since Jan 2014

9479 posts

Posted on 9/21/15 at 5:50 pm to SwaggerVance

quote:
So far yall dumb bastards have no better ideas. Just "full retard" comments. Yall just forfeiting the season or do you think McCown can actually do anything until Brees returns. Lets hear something better or shove every word youre thinking about typing right back up your backdoor.

Dude, come on

I would put this team in McCown's hands in a second before I put it in RG3's, even if he was free. Which he wouldn't be. That guy has serious, serious issues. We would be better off running Cooks in the fricking wildcat.

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by bbrownso

Member since Mar 2008

8985 posts

Posted on 9/21/15 at 9:40 pm to SwaggerVance

quote:
Lets hear something better or shove every word youre thinking about typing right back up your backdoor.

Well, I know that he costs 3.3 million this year which hurts our cap if we trade for him.

And if he gets hurt behind our offensive line, as appears to be the case with Brees, the Saints would be on the hook for 16+ million next year.

quote:
And in the upside down world of NFL contracts, that move essentially ensured that he'd be benched or cut in 2015.

Here's why it works out that way: The $16.2 million for 2016 is not guaranteed -- unless the injury-prone RG3 gets injured. No injury, and the Redskins can cut him loose. Riding the bench, of course, is the best way to keep him healthy.

So yeah, trading for RG3 is a bad idea. If you're that hard up for RG3, why not wait until he gets cleared from his concussion and is possibly cut?

0 ...

Report Post

Saints Talk - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board