Started By
Message

re: Gay Marriage Spinoff: Where should the new line be drawn on marriage?

Posted on 9/3/15 at 2:59 pm to
Posted by madmaxvol
Infinity + 1 Posts
Member since Oct 2011
19269 posts
Posted on 9/3/15 at 2:59 pm to
quote:

but as long as the 2 people can contract otherwise, i'm down


Why limit it to 2?
Posted by dallastigers
Member since Dec 2003
5778 posts
Posted on 9/3/15 at 5:32 pm to
I think the need for state regulation of marriage has passed. I am probably more opposed to how same sex marriage became a right and business owners being fined in some states or forced to go against religious beliefs. I actually don't think 1st Amendment should be applied to the States, but Since it is I think forced recognition of marriage should apply to the state govts only and not individuals or private businesses or churches specifically when is forces them to go against religious beliefs.

I would love to see a state quit regulating marriage completely and see if others follow. That or have a state start letting anyone and any number of people marry including straight same sex marriages including between more than 2 people just to gain some benefit or tax break or limiting inheritance tax in some way or even just because. Just completely loosen it up so state recognition will basically mean nothing after awhile and maybe force Supremes to continue to decide what definition of Marriage is or is not.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram