re: Worse movie: Furious 7 or the Dukes of Hazard?

quote:

---

Reading comprehension is key.

---

It's also pointless when your logic is shite.

quote:

---

Wow. Some people surely get emotionally upset just because someone else has a differing opinion.

---

quote:

---

So, it didn't bother you that Dom travelled all the way to Japan, raced the kid and had a beer with him, got Han's body and flew back to LA all in two fricking days when flying from LA to Tokyo is basically 16 hours of travel? It didn't bother you that they flew to Abu Dhabi overnight when that flight is damn near a day of traveling and when you leave in the daytime in LA you arrive at nighttime in Abu Dhabi because of time differences? It doesn't bother you that when they are driving the carbon fiber super car in the skyscraper in the same room with the special forces super killer shooting at them with a fricking machine gun he somehow totally misses the occupants and all vital parts of the car even though he was in the same gawd damn room? From an editing standpoint, there is a very long list that make the movie a poorly edited one. Perhaps editing is a poor choice of words. Maybe I'm just generalizing timeline problems with editing problems. I guess idiots do these things. Sorry I offended your significant sophisticated intelligence by talking poorly about Furious 7.

---

To answer your questions: no, it didn't bother me, it's a fricking movie.

It's apparent you know nothing about the film-making process as none of these are editing mistakes. This is all part of the script. Of all the liberties with reality the Fast series takes, it's the travel time that upsets you?

Really?

Also, people pumping out thousands of rounds of ammo and not hitting jackshit is something of an industry standard in action movies, if you haven't noticed.

No one is required to like a movie, but the reasoning behind your criticism is dumb, to put it simply.