re: Worse movie: Furious 7 or the Dukes of Hazard?

quote:

---

Wait, did you watch a Fast and Furious film expecting some Oscar-worthy script and performances?

---

No, I expected it to be a fun movie, which it was. Doesn't mean my other points are invalid. Reading comprehension is key. I said I watch it because it's fun.

quote:

---

You're just an idiot.

---

Wow. Some people surely get emotionally upset just because someone else has a differing opinion.

quote:

---

And fwiw I thought the editing on Furious 7 was awesome considering the set of circumstances they were dealt.

---

So, it didn't bother you that Dom travelled all the way to Japan, raced the kid and had a beer with him, got Han's body and flew back to LA all in two fricking days when flying from LA to Tokyo is basically 16 hours of travel? It didn't bother you that they flew to Abu Dhabi overnight when that flight is damn near a day of traveling and when you leave in the daytime in LA you arrive at nighttime in Abu Dhabi because of time differences? It doesn't bother you that when they are driving the carbon fiber super car in the skyscraper in the same room with the special forces super killer shooting at them with a fricking machine gun he somehow totally misses the occupants and all vital parts of the car even though he was in the same gawd damn room? From an editing standpoint, there is a very long list that make the movie a poorly edited one. Perhaps editing is a poor choice of words. Maybe I'm just generalizing timeline problems with editing problems. I guess idiots do these things. Sorry I offended your significant sophisticated intelligence by talking poorly about Furious 7.

But it was fun. That's why I've watched it the two times I've seen it available to watch (excluding the theater).