- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: What are you disappointed about from E3?
Posted on 6/18/15 at 12:40 pm to Grim
Posted on 6/18/15 at 12:40 pm to Grim
More powerful hardware than current systems in order to still be competitive when future hardware comes out. How much more powerful will depend on if MSFT and Sony plan to stick with their 10 year model.
Unified account system with handheld.
Improved online infrastructure.
Quality 1st party titles.
3rd party multi plat support.
Unified account system with handheld.
Improved online infrastructure.
Quality 1st party titles.
3rd party multi plat support.
3
Posted on 6/18/15 at 12:46 pm to GeauxWarTigers
quote:
3rd party multi plat support.
has been such a bane for them... ever since the GC they have basically given up on Multi-plat anything, because of the way the GC found no traction (might be because they had that stupid disk for the GC?!?!?!?!?!)
Their first party games are amazing, and each of them has a pretty big following that absolutely sells their console - but they can't come out with them fast enough to actually sell enough systems - less install base, means companies like FROM Software or Eidos / SE don't want to do exclusive games for them... because they will never be able to port the games over to anything else + the install base just isn't big enough to justify the creation of the game.
It's a catch 22, Nintendo is hurting, and the naming scheme for the WiiU didn't do them ANY justice this generation
Posted on 6/18/15 at 12:55 pm to GeauxWarTigers
quote:
More powerful hardware than current systems in order to still be competitive when future hardware comes out. How much more powerful will depend on if MSFT and Sony plan to stick with their 10 year model.
Unified account system with handheld.
Improved online infrastructure.
Quality 1st party titles.
3rd party multi plat support.
This is a great start. I think that Nintendo needs to be close to PS5/Xbox4. It doesn't need to be more powerful, just able to get every third party title Sony/MS get.
They need to work a lot more with these developers and open up on information to assist with development. I know that tons of developers are freely able to source Naughty Dog and Sony Santa Monica for assistance.
Unified accounts are a requirement. Nintendo doesn't need to innovate the online experience, they just need to meet par set by their competition.
Lastly, I think it's important that they start very strong. A solid launch with good titles coming out in year 1 can set the tone for the rest of the generation.
Posted on 6/18/15 at 1:36 pm to GeauxWarTigers
quote:
More powerful hardware than current systems in order to still be competitive when future hardware comes out. How much more powerful will depend on if MSFT and Sony plan to stick with their 10 year model.
Unified account system with handheld.
Improved online infrastructure.
Quality 1st party titles.
3rd party multi plat support.
If they delivered all this the tide could quickly turn in the console wars IMO. If all the systems have relatively equally powered hardware and functionality, people will look at the exclusives. And Nintendo has by far the most valuable first party exclusives and it's not even close. The fact that they've managed to stay somewhat relevant with just those games is unreal
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News