- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why don't they call obvious intentional fouls intentional?
Posted on 5/26/15 at 6:42 am to The Pirate King
Posted on 5/26/15 at 6:42 am to The Pirate King
quote:
Why don't they call it at the end of games when teams are trying to come back?
It isn't necessarily intentional if the other guy has the ball. Maybe you're just going after the ball more aggressively--if you get the ball, great, if not, the foul might work in your favor. It's a good strategy.
For most of the game you don't want to rack up fouls because you'll put the other team in the double bonus and risk having your guys foul out.
1
Posted on 5/26/15 at 7:33 am to Bestbank Tiger
quote:You're missing the point. You sub in shitty players to hack the poor FT shooter. They don't care how many fouls they get and they don't care about double bonus. The poor FT shooter will be taking the shots and that's the goal. Each possession starts/ends with this hack throwing up a brick or two. I hate it and wish it was intentional fouls.
For most of the game you don't want to rack up fouls because you'll put the other team in the double bonus and risk having your guys foul out.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News