- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Facing multiple legal challenges, UEFA set to ease FFP restrictions
Posted on 5/18/15 at 10:54 am to Draconian Sanctions
Posted on 5/18/15 at 10:54 am to Draconian Sanctions
quote:
listening to TalkSport and they are saying the expected changes will allow for owners to spend their own money, provided they do it in cash and not in the form of a loan to the club or anything else that will add debt
So basically PSG and City get to spend 100 million every window.
While Chelsea who actually can meet FFP can not now. Bc they are in debt to their owner.
Them passing this would create even more of a shite storm.
The EPL rules are already much more lenient than the rest of Europe.
If a club like PSG really brought in 400+ million pounds and City 350+ they should be self sufficient.
We know their revenue streams are suspect.
People like you complain about FFP already favoring the larger clubs well now its going to get worse if this passes.
Clubs like Milan for example could go back to becoming a power over night. Despite being ran like a mikey mouse outfit.
This post was edited on 5/18/15 at 11:01 am
3
Posted on 5/18/15 at 10:59 am to StraightCashHomey21
Annnnnd it begins 
DS will get his arse stomped by SCH as usual and he will up vote his own posts to make him feel better.
DS will get his arse stomped by SCH as usual and he will up vote his own posts to make him feel better. 
Posted on 5/18/15 at 11:06 am to StraightCashHomey21
quote:
So basically PSG and City get to spend 100 million every window.
If that's how those owners want to spend their money
quote:
While Chelsea who actually can meet FFP can not now. Bc they are in debt to their owner.
Roman can still put in whatever money he wants
quote:
Clubs like Milan for example could go back to becoming a power over night. Despite being ran like a mikey mouse outfit.
Why do you get to be the arbiter of what makes an owner "good" and another "bad"? If an owner isn't putting debt onto the club then what's the problem?
If I own a successful toothpaste company, then decide to get involved in the lawn care industry, why should I be prevented from using the money I made in toothpaste to build up my new lawn care service?
This post was edited on 5/18/15 at 11:16 am
Posted on 5/18/15 at 11:20 am to StraightCashHomey21
quote:
So basically PSG and City get to spend 100 million every window.
I mean I won't complain if City get to blow the top off their bank accounts. I think they should be able to spend every season if they want to, and not just them, but all clubs.
However, I do think there should be a cap that all clubs can spend per season (both windows). Maybe you make that 100 million or 75 million. I don't know, but being able to spend 100-200 million every window is certainly not a good thing.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News