re: Starting OL/Gs?

I'm saying if we lose an OG or OT, he would be the first option to play. He might not play the exact spot where the injured player was at, we might shuffle things around to find the best combination of players (Vadal moves to LT or back to OG, Pocic kicks out to OT, Etc. If we lose an OT or an OG, Malone would be th first guy up.

And we have a lot of guys that can play different positions on the OL. Pocic can play anywhere, Vadal has played OG and OT, Boutte has trained at OG and OT, and Malone has been at OT and OG, and iirc he was a center in high school.

Lots of different combinations we could go with at the OL if something happens. And Malone is probably the first OL off the bench if something happens.