- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Which human being has made the biggest impact on human history?
Posted on 4/17/15 at 10:00 pm to NeverRains
Posted on 4/17/15 at 10:00 pm to NeverRains
Eve, bitches be crazy
Posted on 4/17/15 at 10:00 pm to tigerfan in bamaland
quote:
Eve, bitches be crazy
Posted on 4/18/15 at 2:33 am to tigerfan in bamaland
Jesus by a long shot. Jesus was the ultimate rebel, the ultimate anarchist, the ultimate Shift from a few chosen people to hope for everyone. Even if you dont even believe in any god at all, you have to believe that jesus was amazing.
After that, i'd say newton, as an earlier poster said.
But its jesus by a long long long shot.
Newton of course had a certain appreciation for jesus.
Eta: i see a lot of the ole ghengis khan up above. From a pure gene pool perspective, yes. From an idea perspective, no. Ideas trump genes. On the otherhand, maybe khan understood what he was doing. And his sole purpose was to propogate his ideas through genes. Thats legit.
Einstein. He believed in god, and thought jesus was just a bad arse. Einstein was right.
Eta2: i see some very good posts above contending or suggesting paul as being the most influential. I think paul was very important, but even if jesus disnt rise (which is maybe true) and paul just rolled with the story, i dont think paul created the artifice of everything jesus stood for out of whole cloth. Jesus was real in those ways that matter. Namely anarchy, paradigm shift, hope, and a big frick you to everyone who felt entitled, based on, well, nothing except blood. Hence the blood of the lamb in juxtaposition to the old testament riffs on blood.
After that, i'd say newton, as an earlier poster said.
But its jesus by a long long long shot.
Newton of course had a certain appreciation for jesus.
Eta: i see a lot of the ole ghengis khan up above. From a pure gene pool perspective, yes. From an idea perspective, no. Ideas trump genes. On the otherhand, maybe khan understood what he was doing. And his sole purpose was to propogate his ideas through genes. Thats legit.
Einstein. He believed in god, and thought jesus was just a bad arse. Einstein was right.
Eta2: i see some very good posts above contending or suggesting paul as being the most influential. I think paul was very important, but even if jesus disnt rise (which is maybe true) and paul just rolled with the story, i dont think paul created the artifice of everything jesus stood for out of whole cloth. Jesus was real in those ways that matter. Namely anarchy, paradigm shift, hope, and a big frick you to everyone who felt entitled, based on, well, nothing except blood. Hence the blood of the lamb in juxtaposition to the old testament riffs on blood.
This post was edited on 4/18/15 at 2:55 am
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News