- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Should Golfers be called athletes?
Posted on 4/9/15 at 10:00 am to AudubonEagle
Posted on 4/9/15 at 10:00 am to AudubonEagle
Athletes are highly skilled at a some type of physical act that does not come natural to most people. Some of those skills are certainly more desirable and challenging than others, but trying to qualify the definition is pretty useless since there are so many exceptions that you cannot have a general definition.
350lb offensive lineman is not the same as a 230lb running back
NASCAR driver is not the same as a track and field runner
Weightlifter is not the same as a gymnast
Fencing, curling, archery, synchronized swimming, equestrian jumping are all Olympic sports
Trying to define an athlete is an excercise in futility. Instead, the argument should be one that ranks the skill set required, both physical and mental, for a sport.
350lb offensive lineman is not the same as a 230lb running back
NASCAR driver is not the same as a track and field runner
Weightlifter is not the same as a gymnast
Fencing, curling, archery, synchronized swimming, equestrian jumping are all Olympic sports
Trying to define an athlete is an excercise in futility. Instead, the argument should be one that ranks the skill set required, both physical and mental, for a sport.
Posted on 4/9/15 at 10:01 am to DivotBreath
quote:give this man a hand
Athletes are highly skilled at a some type of physical act that does not come natural to most people. Some of those skills are certainly more desirable and challenging than others, but trying to qualify the definition is pretty useless since there are so many exceptions that you cannot have a general definition.
350lb offensive lineman is not the same as a 230lb running back
NASCAR driver is not the same as a track and field runner
Weightlifter is not the same as a gymnast
Fencing, curling, archery, synchronized swimming, equestrian jumping are all Olympic sports
Trying to define an athlete is an excercise in futility. Instead, the argument should be one that ranks the skill set required, both physical and mental, for a sport.
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/Iconbow.gif)
Posted on 4/9/15 at 10:02 am to DivotBreath
quote:
Trying to argue logic on the OT is an excercise in futility.
FIFY
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)