- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: So maybe the trade wasn't about Jimmy
Posted on 3/11/15 at 11:33 am to HollierThanThou
Posted on 3/11/15 at 11:33 am to HollierThanThou
Jimmy was playing less of a tight end roll and more of a wide receiver these days and lining out more. I feel that made him less effective. There was no disguising that he could stay on the line or go out. He was out as a wide out and was jammed more. Maybe Saints wanted to get the money out of him....Also, he was the top "target" for DBs every sunday and was double teamed more. But as many have said on this board, the O-line was more of an importance than it was to have a high priced tight end that was really a wide out at this point. Still good production, but was a luxury. Drew is best when he spreads the ball around and Jimmy was becoming too often a target to "lean" on.
Posted on 3/11/15 at 11:39 am to TigerB8
quote:
Ian Rapoport ?@RapSheet 3m3 minutes ago Interesting… In initial talks, @Alex_Flanagan said #Saints GM Mickey Loomis threw out some WRs to Seattle for potential trades. Wonder who
I'm guessing Colston and/or Toon, which Seattle probably laughed at both. I would have a hard time seeing them include Cooks or Stills.
This post was edited on 3/11/15 at 11:41 am
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News