Started By
Message

re: Legal challenge to FFP moving along

Posted on 3/3/15 at 8:54 am to
Posted by StraightCashHomey21
Aberdeen,NC
Member since Jul 2009
125490 posts
Posted on 3/3/15 at 8:54 am to
quote:

Hadn't won the league in 50 years, only a small handful of top 4 finishes in that time. You're really going to try to say with a straight face they would be where there are now if FFP were instituted in say, 1999?



Would they be as good, of course not. Difference they got their kick start and changed their ways. City and PSG have no intentions of doing so. City was a yoyo club that the initial cash helped. But spending over 100 million window after window is absurd. Chelsea didn't even do that.

Since the premier league started City have almost caught Chelsea in money spent on players even though Chelsea had a huge head start. The revolving door at City is bad for the league and especially for youth players who are english or anywhere else.

quote:

You said PSG and City were the only 2 clubs against FFP, I proved you wrong.



They were in the Championship at the time, like they were even relevant. Along with other Championship clubs who voted against it.
This post was edited on 3/3/15 at 8:57 am
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
84918 posts
Posted on 3/3/15 at 9:23 am to
quote:

Difference they got their kick start and changed their ways. City and PSG have no intentions of doing so.


So are you saying you'd be okay with an initial large outlay of funds to kick start a club and build a fanbase/extra revenue streams?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram