re: Chavis felt his defense was under unnecessary strain?

quote:

---

Also if it was a culture focused solely on offense they wouldn't have gone out there way to get Chavis on their staff

---

Seems more like the AD giving Sumlin ample cause to be fired if he can't put together a complete team with a proven DC.

You think people bitch about Miles and his 4.3 mil?

quote:

---

You should take a look at the recruits they have signed lately on defense. Chavis will have plenty of talent to work with on defense over there. Also if it was a culture focused solely on offense they wouldn't have gone out there way to get Chavis on their staff. Makes no sense to think that just because you want to have a good offense that you don't want a good defense. Look at Bama or Ohio St. They both manage to have both.

---

Boxcar.....I live here....I've watched every game they played last year. There 2013 class of recruits has dismantled.......the only talented players on Defense currently are made up of 2 men: Watts & Myles......everything else they displayed has been hot garbage.

You can't tell me Synder was So bad he couldn't field a D that ranked under triple digits in team stats.......that's fricking crap.

They went after Chavis so Sumlin could have a scape goat. He now resides in the perfect situation. Score points but if defense sucks again he can blame a man with stripes on the wall and save face.

Their core defensive unit missed on every possible recruit they needed this year sans Mack.......they missed out on 3 huge CBs, 1 safety, hell they had to steal a LB committed to ULL.

I don't care what the recruiting rankings say: what I've seen them field is pudding.