Started By
Message

re: Marilyn vos Savant and the history of the Montel Hall question

Posted on 2/23/15 at 5:20 pm to
Posted by Sid in Lakeshore
Member since Oct 2008
41956 posts
Posted on 2/23/15 at 5:20 pm to
quote:

In Let's Make A Deal, you aren't better off switching at the end because all results are independent of each other.


In let's make a deal, in this 3 door game, you are better off switching every damn time, unless you think they hurry up and move the car after Monte eliminates one door. Period, end of discussion, it is a point of probability theory that is easily proved.

If the car is randomly placed behind one of three doors, and never moved, your first pick yields 2 sets in the statistical universe, one with 33% chance and another with 67% chance of having a car. Monte's removal of one door does not at all change the probability of them choosing to place the car behind the door they did, which still yields a 33% chance of it being behind your original selection and a 67% chance of it not being behind there.

Since we know one door is removed from set #2, the remaining door now is the only option in set #2 which still has 67% chance of containing the car.

I'm done, this is funny.
Posted by link
Member since Feb 2009
19867 posts
Posted on 2/23/15 at 5:26 pm to
quote:

this is funny.

agreed. keep an eye out for my annual monty hall question thread next january.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram