- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Seems like most people have Matic's back after Barnes' horror tackle
Posted on 2/23/15 at 10:06 am to StraightCashHomey21
Posted on 2/23/15 at 10:06 am to StraightCashHomey21
quote:
The FA confirmed on Monday that because the incident was seen by referee Martin Atkinson during the game no further action could be taken.
Such bull that because a ref sees an incident no further action can be taken. Why can't they just admit their employees made a mistake and make a move to rectify it.
I also want to comment on MCB saying because Matic's leg wasn't broken means it wasn't dangerous. You can see his leg bend in the videos. That's dangerous and lucky Matic's leg remained strong. Does not make it an okay play. That's a horrible argument.
Posted on 2/23/15 at 10:07 am to KneffLSU
quote:
"In the vast majority of challenges for the ball, no retrospective action is taken as the incident has been seen by the match officials. Retrospective action introduced as deterrent for ‘off the ball incidents’ [e.g. kicks, stamps etc.] committed out of sight of officials. Whole game in agreement that, in vast majority of cases, match officials are best-placed to deal with incidents to avoid re-refereeing. In line with this rationale, FA confirm no further action in relation to Ashley Barnes as incident was seen by the officials"
Posted on 2/23/15 at 10:58 am to KneffLSU
quote:
I also want to comment on MCB saying because Matic's leg wasn't broken means it wasn't dangerous.
You can't fix that kind of stupid.
I genuinely thought he was trolling at first but apparently not.
It really is the worst logic/line of thinking I've ever seen.
He probably wonders why drunk drivers are ticketed unless they cause a fatal crash or why charges like attempted murder exist if they weren't successful.
This post was edited on 2/23/15 at 11:00 am
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)