Started By
Message

re: This is why Super Bowl rings are mostly irrelevant

Posted on 2/2/15 at 12:36 pm to
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
111291 posts
Posted on 2/2/15 at 12:36 pm to
quote:

I did not say that. I simply said that Brady was playing at a higher level in 2006-2012 then Rodgers has over a similar period. 
ok, my bad.

Not sure how you can think that after I posted that Rodgers for his career is better at basically everything compared to Brady in that time frame.

quote:

2007 Tom Brady is better than anything Aaron Rodgers has done so far. 

2011 Rodgers was more efficient. Slightly lower completion percentage, but better TD%, better int%, much higher YPA, better Passer rating.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram