Started By
Message

re: This is why Super Bowl rings are mostly irrelevant

Posted on 2/2/15 at 8:12 am to
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
111291 posts
Posted on 2/2/15 at 8:12 am to
quote:

Rodgers would go in that Marino, Elway, Peyton catagory of guys more skilled then Brady is. There is just no way I could compare the resume to Brady and put him over Tom in terms of "Greatness". Brady's resume is insane now. He has literally done almost everything
That's just where we agree to disagree.

I posted earlier in this thread, someone mentioned Brady 2006-2012 being the greatest QBing they'd seen. I pointed out Rodgers for his career is better than Brady 2006-2012) at basically every measure, so I give the nod to Rodgers based on his career production/efficiency being a good bit better than every other QB to ever play.
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
65147 posts
Posted on 2/2/15 at 12:20 pm to
quote:

someone mentioned Brady 2006-2012 being the greatest QBing they'd seen.


I did not say that. I simply said that Brady was playing at a higher level in 2006-2012 then Rodgers has over a similar period.

2007 Tom Brady is better than anything Aaron Rodgers has done so far.

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram