- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: This is why Super Bowl rings are mostly irrelevant
Posted on 2/1/15 at 9:54 pm to shel311
Posted on 2/1/15 at 9:54 pm to shel311
quote:
No, the 1 play is my exact logic
Using one play and one player as your logic is bad logic. You are trying to make a very bold statement, that SB rings are meaningless, by using one player and one play as an example.
Maybe if you want to just say "this is why winning this SB is irrelevant in determining Brady's legacy", then you have a valid argument.
1
Posted on 2/1/15 at 9:56 pm to rintintin
quote:Mostly irrelevant, to be exact.
You are trying to make a very bold statement, that SB rings are meaningless
quote:Isn't that what I've said for 6 pages?
Maybe if you want to just say "this is why winning this SB is irrelevant in determining Brady's legacy", then you have a valid argument.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News