Started By
Message

re: This is why Super Bowl rings are mostly irrelevant

Posted on 2/1/15 at 9:47 pm to
Posted by rockchlkjayhku11
Cincinnati, OH
Member since Aug 2006
36567 posts
Posted on 2/1/15 at 9:47 pm to
Is he that amount of great if that happens to him in all 6 Super Bowls? What if teams scored on the pats late and won in other playoff games and he had 0 Super Bowls but his stats remained exactly the same as now? Where do you draw the line on this extrapolation? At some point, you gotta win, right? I don't know, just asking.

Is Matt Ryan the same amount of good because he didn't convert 4th down against the niners a few years ago? I mean that one pass makes him no better or worse overall as a quarterback. No single play can have that effect, right?

Now take that and apply it across every big play ever and what happens?
This post was edited on 2/1/15 at 9:50 pm
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
111703 posts
Posted on 2/1/15 at 9:51 pm to
quote:

Is he that amount of great if that happens to him in all 6 Super Bowls?
Yes

quote:

At some point, you gotta win, right? I don't know, just asking.
I don't think so, which is why Dan Marino is considered top 3 all time by most, or plenty at least.

quote:

Now take that and apply it across every big play ever and what happens?
Ok, but you're talking about plays the QB, or whoever, have an actual say in the outcome of that play, that's the difference, and crux of my premise.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram