Started By
Message

re: Belicheck or Brady, who is more likely to NOT be a Patriot next year?

Posted on 1/27/15 at 2:43 pm to
Posted by PurpGold 14-0
Member since Nov 2012
3801 posts
Posted on 1/27/15 at 2:43 pm to
quote:

Forcing the Patriots to decide on three full years of guaranteed base salaries (2015-17) in Week 17 of the previous campaign (2014) meant the Patriots would only really move on from Brady if he was unable to play or if they were out of long-term contention.

quote:

Instead, Brady and his camp have made the truthfully stunning move to simply wipe the guarantees off the books. They’ll take a modest $1 million increase in base salary in each of the three remaining seasons, likely to pacify the union, because I promise you Brady isn’t taking an extra $3 million in nonguaranteed money to pass up as much as $24 million in guaranteed cash. Brady’s three base salaries will now be guaranteed solely for injury, meaning the Patriots could theoretically cut a healthy Brady as early as this offseason without owing him a dime in future base salaries.
Posted by KosmoCramer
Member since Dec 2007
76650 posts
Posted on 1/27/15 at 3:01 pm to
quote:

meaning the Patriots could theoretically cut a healthy Brady as early as this offseason without owing him a dime in future base salaries.


Do you even know the context of the statement you bolded?
Posted by TigerBait1127
Houston
Member since Jun 2005
47336 posts
Posted on 1/27/15 at 3:31 pm to
quote:

meaning the Patriots could theoretically cut a healthy Brady as early as this offseason without owing him a dime in future base salaries.


And they would still be on the hook for his signing bonus...

That is why I said cap hit. Also, he's only a $14 million cap hit. Jesus
This post was edited on 1/27/15 at 3:33 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram