Started By
Message

re: Capital Gains at Death

Posted on 1/21/15 at 4:27 pm to
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
37857 posts
Posted on 1/21/15 at 4:27 pm to
quote:

basis can actually be negative


Basis can never go below zero.

As for the example you gave... think about economically.

There can only be a few reasons I can think of to have that big of a difference between debt and basis:

1) At least one 1031 exchange has occured, in which case, the taxpayer upon sale is really recognizing the gain on more than one property

2) A relatively recent loan was taken against the property, maybe in a refinance, and the proceeds were not capitalized back in the property, and instead where used on other property.

3) Same as two, but instead of using it on another property, it was used on the subject property, but ordinary expense deductions were taken (maybe a bunch of repairs written off).

The owner may be coming out of pocket to pay the tax, but the owner has enjoyed greater tax deductions over the years. Truly, the time to pay the piper has come.
Posted by Maderan
Member since Feb 2005
818 posts
Posted on 1/21/15 at 4:39 pm to
Negative basis is a lose way of saying negative capital--debt in excess of basis. Many long term real estate investors I work with use this as a term. The basis is not actually negative.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram