- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Interstate Cable Barriers
Posted on 1/5/15 at 8:25 am to Road Tiger
Posted on 1/5/15 at 8:25 am to Road Tiger
quote:
Concrete has no give and if you hit a concrete barrier at interstate speeds your odds of surviving decrease dramatically
Concrete barriers are not unsafe. You do realize that most points of contact with any median highway barrier running parallel to travel lanes are going to be a glancing blow and not a head on collision, right?
There is more give in the cables, but the main reason they are popular now because there aren't many other options for medians with a drainage swale, which is what most rural American interstate highways have.
I think they need to redesign them to be useful further from the highway. They are just too close, subjecting them to minor impacts. It's a good idea that needs to evolve.
This post was edited on 1/5/15 at 8:34 am
Posted on 1/5/15 at 8:35 am to member12
quote:
You do realize that most points of contact with any median highway barrier running parallel to travel lanes are going to be a glancing blow and not a head on collision, right?
In an urban setting with a tight corridor, yes that is correct.
But in instances where you're talking about wide open pieces of interstate, you're not dealing with glancing blows. You're looking at things like drivers falling asleep at the wheel and veering into the median. That is where cables come in.
What end treatment do you propose for a concrete barrier in the middle of the interstate with a 75 mph speed limit? How can you design that safely with no chance of fatalities?
ETA: I realize that with everything, there is some chance of fatality. But in road design, you design at the absolute minimum risk, especially with interstates.
This post was edited on 1/5/15 at 8:40 am
Posted on 1/5/15 at 11:09 am to member12
You're still not getting it. The main difference between the two is that the cables "catch" you and absorb the impact much better than concrete because they stretch and break. It is basically a conservation of momentum concept when you break it down
And to your point about them being close to the road, I haven't seen any that didn't at least have a lane's width between the edge of the road and the cable. There is a reason for that also
*I'm no traffic engineer, but if you look at everything logically and use your ENTIRE brain, you should be able to figure this stuff out
And to your point about them being close to the road, I haven't seen any that didn't at least have a lane's width between the edge of the road and the cable. There is a reason for that also
*I'm no traffic engineer, but if you look at everything logically and use your ENTIRE brain, you should be able to figure this stuff out
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News