Started By
Message

re: Interstate Cable Barriers

Posted on 1/5/15 at 8:25 am to
Posted by member12
Bob's Country Bunker
Member since May 2008
32145 posts
Posted on 1/5/15 at 8:25 am to
quote:

Concrete has no give and if you hit a concrete barrier at interstate speeds your odds of surviving decrease dramatically


Concrete barriers are not unsafe. You do realize that most points of contact with any median highway barrier running parallel to travel lanes are going to be a glancing blow and not a head on collision, right?

There is more give in the cables, but the main reason they are popular now because there aren't many other options for medians with a drainage swale, which is what most rural American interstate highways have.

I think they need to redesign them to be useful further from the highway. They are just too close, subjecting them to minor impacts. It's a good idea that needs to evolve.
This post was edited on 1/5/15 at 8:34 am
Posted by Road Tiger
SW Landmass
Member since Oct 2014
834 posts
Posted on 1/5/15 at 8:35 am to
quote:

You do realize that most points of contact with any median highway barrier running parallel to travel lanes are going to be a glancing blow and not a head on collision, right?


In an urban setting with a tight corridor, yes that is correct.

But in instances where you're talking about wide open pieces of interstate, you're not dealing with glancing blows. You're looking at things like drivers falling asleep at the wheel and veering into the median. That is where cables come in.

What end treatment do you propose for a concrete barrier in the middle of the interstate with a 75 mph speed limit? How can you design that safely with no chance of fatalities?

ETA: I realize that with everything, there is some chance of fatality. But in road design, you design at the absolute minimum risk, especially with interstates.
This post was edited on 1/5/15 at 8:40 am
Posted by Hammertime
Will trade dowsing rod for titties
Member since Jan 2012
43030 posts
Posted on 1/5/15 at 11:09 am to
You're still not getting it. The main difference between the two is that the cables "catch" you and absorb the impact much better than concrete because they stretch and break. It is basically a conservation of momentum concept when you break it down

And to your point about them being close to the road, I haven't seen any that didn't at least have a lane's width between the edge of the road and the cable. There is a reason for that also


*I'm no traffic engineer, but if you look at everything logically and use your ENTIRE brain, you should be able to figure this stuff out
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram