- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Are older movies truly better?
Posted on 12/28/14 at 10:04 am to CrazyCrawfish
Posted on 12/28/14 at 10:04 am to CrazyCrawfish
quote:Acting in older movies (pre-70s or so) is extremely overrated.
somtimes better acting
Posted on 12/28/14 at 12:44 pm to Patrick_Bateman
quote:This I would agree with.
Acting in older movies (pre-70s or so) is extremely overrated.
Posted on 12/28/14 at 4:44 pm to Patrick_Bateman
quote:I sort of agree
Acting in older movies (pre-70s or so) is extremely overrated.
Anything before about 1950, outside of a few of the top actors (Bogart, Grant, Jimmy Stewart, etc) the acting is terrible. My dad will every now and then make me watch something pre-WWII, and about 95% of the time the acting is painfully terrible.
By the mid-50's this isn't true anymore. Alot of it is in the early days actors and actresses were play acting in front of cameras. They hadn't figured quite out yet that there is a big difference in film acting and stage acting. And I think before the late 40's the dialogue in a lot of movies was pretty terrible.
But pre-70's? That's not true at all. Try like pre-WWII.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News