Started By
Message

re: Are older movies truly better?

Posted on 12/28/14 at 10:04 am to
Posted by Patrick_Bateman
Member since Jan 2012
17823 posts
Posted on 12/28/14 at 10:04 am to
quote:

somtimes better acting
Acting in older movies (pre-70s or so) is extremely overrated.
Posted by Hoodoo Man
Sunshine Pumping most days.
Member since Oct 2011
31637 posts
Posted on 12/28/14 at 12:44 pm to
quote:

Acting in older movies (pre-70s or so) is extremely overrated.
This I would agree with.
Posted by danman6336
Member since Jan 2005
19440 posts
Posted on 12/28/14 at 4:44 pm to
quote:

Acting in older movies (pre-70s or so) is extremely overrated.
I sort of agree

Anything before about 1950, outside of a few of the top actors (Bogart, Grant, Jimmy Stewart, etc) the acting is terrible. My dad will every now and then make me watch something pre-WWII, and about 95% of the time the acting is painfully terrible.

By the mid-50's this isn't true anymore. Alot of it is in the early days actors and actresses were play acting in front of cameras. They hadn't figured quite out yet that there is a big difference in film acting and stage acting. And I think before the late 40's the dialogue in a lot of movies was pretty terrible.

But pre-70's? That's not true at all. Try like pre-WWII.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram