Started By
Message

re: Grand Jury Doesn't Indict Cops who kill man with down syndrome

Posted on 12/8/14 at 6:14 pm to
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
114085 posts
Posted on 12/8/14 at 6:14 pm to
quote:

But he wasn't killed for watching a movie twice.


frick it. He kinda was. If he had a drug conviction, the police would've released it to sully his reputation and justify their reaction. Another time they want it both ways. He didn't have a drug conviction. He wasn't pimping hoes. He wasn't running a fight club. He was sitting in a movie theater watching a fricking movie. That's what precipitated police force on a young man with Down's syndrome.
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
58328 posts
Posted on 12/8/14 at 6:48 pm to
quote:

He kinda was.
so it's your contention that "sitting in a movie theater watching a fricking movie" was the motivation for killing him?

If that st true, the charge should be murder. But I don't see any evidence to indicate that.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram