Started By
Message

re: Since 2007: LSU (2 SEC WC, 2 SECC, 1 NC), Bama (5 SEC WC, 3 SECC, 3 NC)

Posted on 12/7/14 at 1:33 am to
Posted by Open Your Eyes
Member since Nov 2012
9252 posts
Posted on 12/7/14 at 1:33 am to
quote:

So why are you doing it? What's your motivation for discrediting national championships. If you were fair, you would discredit the '03 title also but it's obvious why you won't touch that one but you will shite on '07.


I was asked why 2007 gets called lucky and 2003 doesn't. All I've done in this thread is explain why that is. The fact that you and your fellow pumpers are taking my answer to a question as a discredit, or that you can't accept facts as they are presented when they don't paint miles in a positive light, really isn't my problem.
Posted by Nuts4LSU
Washington, DC
Member since Oct 2003
25468 posts
Posted on 12/7/14 at 1:57 am to
quote:

why 2007 gets called lucky and 2003 doesn't


Another pointless line of argument. LSU was the best team in the nation both years and legitimately won the NC both years. Also, in both years, it took some other things happening to get us into the NC game. Yes, we needed West Virginia to be upset by Pitt in 2007. Contrary to popular legend, that was the only surprising result that helped us into the NC game, as Missouri was a decided underdog to Oklahoma, which had just throttled them a couple of weeks earlier, and no way was VT, the eventual #3 in BCS, going to be ranked ahead of a team that crushed them 48-7. Likewise, in 2003, a late-night Boise St.-Hawaii game tipped the SOS component of the BCS formula in our favor. Nevertheless, we were clearly the best team in the country both years, deserved to win, and DID win, the national championship both years.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram