- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Poll Question: Eric Garner
Posted on 12/5/14 at 3:46 am to TOKEN
Posted on 12/5/14 at 3:46 am to TOKEN
Yes IMHO there should have been an indictment. whether he was found guilty or not it would lay out all the facts and laws involved and help end some of the ridicules speculation going on. Having a trial also sends a signal that cops are not above the law.
2
Posted on 12/5/14 at 3:59 am to cave canem
quote:
Having a trial also sends a signal that cops are not above the law.
But you don't indict someone simply dor the sake of having a trial. Why would they even have a grand jury if you just want to parade the person for the sake of a trial of a jury of one's peers do not think there is enough evidence?
And I'm no cop apologist.
Posted on 12/5/14 at 6:39 am to cave canem
quote:
it would lay out all the facts and laws
What do you think a grand jury does?
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News