- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: .
Posted on 12/3/14 at 5:02 pm to DelU249
Posted on 12/3/14 at 5:02 pm to DelU249
quote:
..."it is my determination that BLANK is a danger to him/herself and/or others" gets you in the system...that's not due process and there is no judicial recourse
I haven't read the law but I did see another poster say there was no appeal mechanism or anything else resembling due process and if that is true, I hope (and think) the law will be scuttled as unconstitutional
I'm ok with involuntary curbing of rightrs under certain circumstances, but there has to be a mechanism to challenge and appeal the initial finding.
And yeah, I didn't really think it was a bannable offense, but I don't make the rules.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)