Started By
Message

re: House votes to save A-10 fleet

Posted on 12/2/14 at 4:12 pm to
Posted by son of arlo
State of Innocence
Member since Sep 2013
4577 posts
Posted on 12/2/14 at 4:12 pm to
quote:

They should build a new, improved platform around that gun.


Instead of flying worn out A-10s? I agree!

quote:

But, no - they wanted to get a cheap version of the F-22 for ground support (which it will be terrible at - except, maybe, delivering JDAMs)


You know that's from the lips of congresscritters. A fast mover won't ever be effective CAS. Anyone with any sense knows better. It's another "Grubering."

quote:

Rather than field a real combat platform to fight real wars the way we've really been fighting them for 20 years, they want all this gee whiz, pie-in-the-sky, prohibitively expensive $hit.


No love for Apaches? IMHO, much better for real time CAS.

quote:

It won't be long before the Army requests ground support and USAF says, "Sorry - we just don't have the platforms."

Close them down then - or limit them solely to Air/Space Superiority


We are shutting them down already.

Posted by Volvagia
Fort Worth
Member since Mar 2006
51958 posts
Posted on 12/2/14 at 4:26 pm to
Apaches are only better if you have enough of them to have them on site for each fire mission at all times.

In the real world, Warthogs are faster, bring 4 times more armament to bear, easier to keep combat ready, and are far less vulnerable to fire than Apaches.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram