Started By
Message

re: Here's a nice "f*ck you" to the Climate Change apostles (caution: sciency shite)

Posted on 11/19/14 at 10:07 am to
Posted by Iosh
Bureau of Interstellar Immigration
Member since Dec 2012
18941 posts
Posted on 11/19/14 at 10:07 am to
quote:

I know the term existed. I'm saying there has been a definite effort to replace the words global warming with the words climate change.
The funny thing is, you're not wrong about this.

You're just wrong about who.

LINK
quote:

We have spent the last seven years examining how best to communicate complicated ideas and controversial subjects. The terminology in the upcoming environmental debate needs refinement, starting with “global warming” and ending with “environmentalism.” It’s time for us to start talking about “climate change” instead of global warming and “conservation” instead of preservation.

1. “Climate change” is less frightening than “global warming.” As one focus group participant noted, climate change “sounds like you’re going from Pittsburgh to Fort Lauderdale.” While global warming has catastrophic connotations attached to it, climate change suggests a more controllable and less emotional challenge.
This post was edited on 11/19/14 at 10:08 am
Posted by BugAC
St. George
Member since Oct 2007
53109 posts
Posted on 11/19/14 at 10:26 am to
quote:

Iosh


Care to dispute the global warming/climate change agenda? Care to tell us

1. What weather is attributed to man?
2. What should the temperature of Earth be year round, and exactly what factors at what specific points is causing the weather to do what weather does? For instance, if it is 80 degrees in march in the south, and not 70, what did humans do to change this? If it is in the 40's as it is now, in South Louisiana, what factors caused by man has caused this? What temperature should it be? SHould the temperature be the same throughout the world at all times?
3. Why has there been a shift from "global warming" to "climate change"? I know you are trying to divert from actually addressing the issue to arguing that its always been climate change, but if you are honest you know there has been a change in terminology by the politicians/media/paid scientists.
4. Do you care to discuss the articles merits that state that the change in weather around the globe is due to ..... WEATHER and not man?
5. Why do you liberal global warming nazis not take an approach of, "we must all be good stewards of this planet" instead of "any change in weather is attributed to SUV's".
6. Care to discuss why man made CO2 is attributed to the change in CO2 emissions, and not the more bountiful expulsion of CO2 by all life on this planet?
7. Care to discuss the climate change of the little ice age? The climate change of Europe from a tropical to a more temperate environment 600 years ago? Why is all climate change prior to recordable data considered natural and any slight gust of wind attributed to man?
8. Care to discuss why the scientific community has rejected global warming and the climate change scientists?
9. Care to discuss the hacked emails of the global warming/climate change scientists that state that their findings do not coincide with man made climate change?
10. Care to discuss why CO2 is the driver of temperature on Earth when it makes up .004% of the atmosphere? Care to discuss why CO2 is considered a driver of climate change as opposed to water vapor?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram