Started By
Message

re: Primary healthcare services crisis - how does Obamacare address it?

Posted on 11/17/14 at 10:15 am to
Posted by MSMHater
Houston
Member since Oct 2008
22782 posts
Posted on 11/17/14 at 10:15 am to
quote:

Since Medicare sets low reimbursement rates for regular office visits to primary care physicians, do major health insurance companies follow their lead in negotiating reimbursement rates?


CMS has increased PCP reibmursement as a part of Obamacare, but that increase has been immediately nullified by federal "incentives" that require significant capital outlay to implement them. EMR implementation, meaningful use, PQRS reporting, etc... all cost a shite ton of money and human capital, and offices with 3 or less physicians don't have the economies of scale to pull them off. So they are hit with a 1% reduction in CMS reimbursement for each incentive they can't meet...and there goes the increased reimbursement.

Private payers do follow CMS with regard to pricing, usually + 3%-8%.

quote:

Is there a solution to this problem?

More residency opportunities for primary care? Better tuition reimbursement programs for med students who go into primary care? Redesign some of the EMR incentive programs to accomodate small practices? Increas reimbursement for consult and f/u codes for PCPs?

quote:

How does Obamacare address the primary healthcare services crisis that many parts of this country has experienced over the past couple of decades?


Pilot payment systems based on quality (won't work) and slightly increase reimbursement for PCP's.

quote:

Would real medical care reform be complete without addressing primary health care services? How would Washington go about encouraging more medical professionals to enter primary care specialties? Is that even possible?


Yes, primary care would need a revamp for any successfull healthcare "redesign", but we seem to just be headed for primary care provided by mid-levels with minimal phsyicians supervision.

Which personally, I'm fine with, but I'm a 35 year old healthy person with connections to many medical specialties and a PA for a wife.

I'm not sure the 68 year old diabetic with COPD and an abnormal liver panel wants his treatment from a NP or PA.


ETA: Medicaid is also a HUGE problem for PCP's. MCD reimbursement does not cover the cost of providing care, forcing docs that see mostly MCD patients to herd them through clinic as fast as possible in order to simply break even. Obamacare has only made this problem much worse by adding so many uninsured to MCD rolls. Particularly when most PCP's won't even take it at this point if they don't have to.
This post was edited on 11/17/14 at 10:20 am
Posted by Al Dante
Member since Mar 2013
1859 posts
Posted on 11/17/14 at 10:19 am to
Your post has so many acronyms I gave up after the first paragraph.
Posted by dewster
Chicago
Member since Aug 2006
25446 posts
Posted on 11/17/14 at 10:25 am to
quote:

Pilot payment systems based on quality (won't work) and slightly increase reimbursement for PCP's.


So basically nothing is really changing?

quote:

Which personally, I'm fine with, but I'm a 35 year old healthy person with connections to many medical specialties and a PA for a wife.

I'm not sure the 68 year old diabetic with COPD and an abnormal liver panel wants his treatment from a NP or PA.



I agree completely. I don't see much of an issue with going that route, but as you've said, I can see the concern with a very diverse patient load.

Wouldn't this eventually push PAs and NPs out of traditional family medicine much the way they are currently chasing MDs and DOs into more specialized practices without some added incentive to move into primary care specialties?

quote:

Medicaid is also a HUGE problem for PCP's. MCD reimbursement does not cover the cost of providing care, forcing docs that see mostly MCD patients to herd them through clinic as fast as possible in order to simply break even. Obamacare has only made this problem much worse by adding so many uninsured to MCD rolls. Particularly when most PCP's won't even take it at this point if they don't have to.


This is also my concern. The added MCD patient rolls would hurt the bottom line for primary care professionals such as your wife, thus providing less incentive to enter primary care specialties out of allopathic/osteopathic medical schools, PA schools, or nursing schools.

This would hit the rural area like my home town especially hard. It's not uncommon for my parents to have to wait a week or more to see their doctor for a 10-15 minute appointment.

quote:

MSMhater


Thanks for the insight.
This post was edited on 11/17/14 at 10:38 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram