Started By
Message

re: Obamacare Appeal --- Jonathan Gruber doing more work

Posted on 11/16/14 at 1:58 pm to
Posted by MMauler
Member since Jun 2013
19216 posts
Posted on 11/16/14 at 1:58 pm to
quote:

A video (whether anonymous or official) of the self proclaimed architect of Obamacare discussing what he believes Congress meant and what he intended does not meet that evidentiary standard.



There's only one rule of evidence that speaks to the issue.

And, according to that rule, the "standard" is there can be no reasonable dispute as to the fact, where the fact is "capable of accurate and ready determination by resort to sources whose accuracy cannot reasonably be questioned."

THAT'S IT.

Clearly, there can be no reasonable dispute as to this video's authenticity -- especially when it is being presented as rebuttal evidence to the CLEAR LIES that the Odumbf*ck administration will be offering.
Posted by FalseProphet
Mecca
Member since Dec 2011
11708 posts
Posted on 11/16/14 at 2:00 pm to
Well, relevance comes into play too, but i still haven't seen the videos. We talking Fox News footage or handheld cell phone posted to youtube? You have less problems with the former, but myriad problems with the latter. A judge would never be able to take judicial notice of the latter.
Posted by FalseProphet
Mecca
Member since Dec 2011
11708 posts
Posted on 11/16/14 at 2:02 pm to
And what fact is being proven? Sounds like hearsay to me, right?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram