re: Analysis on Alabama and Tom Ritter

quote:

---

It's bigger than being an alumni if he is an alumni, you guys will figure it out eventually and will shite yourselves.

---

I'm not one of the TD sleuths. For me, it doesn't require anything more than knowing that two of the most influential people within the walls of the SEC office are Alabama alumni. Given they go through the pitiful motions of attempting to make sure officials have no ties to the programs they are officiating (I'm not going to point out the plethora of loopholes for which there are no rules but I'm sure you can all see them clearly) then they understand that being too close to a program could potentially sway one's judgement.

So which is it? If being too close to a member program could lead to the inability to do one's job impartially, why no raised eyebrows about Mark Womack and Steve Shaw? Who in the SEC benefits from not asking this very simple question?

Anything beyond that is outside of my scope.