re: Let's hear from those complaining about the Miles "offensive philosophy"

quote:

---

Rather, I'm using your criteria to show the fallacy of your line of reasoning.

---

you haven't shown any fallacy whatsoever. you're using flawed examples to try to disparage miles' accomplishments. malzahn has been at auburn for a very short amount of time. there is no way in the world to say that over a any period of time, his spread offense system with him as head coach is producing more wins. it frankly is not. and you even admitted miles is 1-1 straight up.

the only person for any length of time playing equal competition who can equal miles is saban. iow, miles' system works as good as anybody's. he makes the adjustments that need to be made and he calls the plays that need to be called in order to win. but i understand that's not good enough for you

quote:

---

"pitfalls", "5 years", "lightning in a bottle," takeaway Auburn's plays, . . . and the cycle repeats.

---

nothing in any of these criteria i posted is not factual or unreasonable. negas on the other hand, can only refer to subjective things like

"more balance"
"not improving fast enough"
"doesn't recruit well"
"can't develop qb's"
"doesn't use talent right"
"too conservative"

quote:

---

another one of your disingenuous claims

---

it's nothing of the sort. how often are there 3k yard passers in the sec west over the last 10 years? you show proof that miles is willing to open it up when appropriate and can't even realize it disproves what negas say about miles.

your definition of factual is creative