- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: It's 2000; What are you arguing here regarding who won Florida?
Posted on 10/23/14 at 7:28 am to FT
Posted on 10/23/14 at 7:28 am to FT
amazing to me that the "cut spending" types would still want Bush over Gore considering that the former took over a budget surplus and promptly flushed it down the toilet and then proceeded to tear through a TRILLION dollars getting revenge on Saddam for trying to kill his daddy.
Posted on 10/23/14 at 7:35 am to FT
quote:
Ultimately, a media consortium—comprising the New York Times, Washington Post, Wall Street Journal, Tribune Co. (parent of the Los Angeles Times), Associated Press, CNN, Palm Beach Post and St. Petersburg Times[65]—hired the National Opinion Research Center at the University of Chicago[66] to examine 175,010 ballots that were collected from the entire state, not just the disputed counties that were discounted; these ballots contained undervotes (votes with no choice made for president) and overvotes (votes made with more than one choice marked). Their goal was to determine the reliability and accuracy of the systems used for the voting process. The NORC concluded that if the disputes over the validity of all the ballots statewide in question had been consistently resolved and any uniform standard applied, the electoral result would have been reversed and Gore would have won by 107–115 votes if only two of the three coders had to agree on the ballot. When counting ballots wherein all three coders agreed, Gore would have won the most restrictive scenario by 127 votes and Bush would have won the most inclusive scenario by 110 votes. Inclusive in media reporting likely refers to including the undervotes (only) as these people were then included in the vote. Whether overvotes were truly nullified in counts is not known.[67]
Subsequent analyses cast further doubt on conclusions that Bush likely would have won anyway, had the U.S. Supreme Court not intervened. An analysis of the NORC data by University of Pennsylvania researcher Steven F. Freeman and journalist Joel Bleifuss concluded that a recount of all uncounted votes using any standard (inclusive, strict, statewide or county by county), Gore would have been the victor.
LINK
This post was edited on 10/23/14 at 7:37 am
Posted on 10/23/14 at 8:08 am to FT
It was either a giant douche or a shite sandwich.
Posted on 10/23/14 at 8:15 am to FT
who ever had the most votes.
I was pretty young during that election I didn't care to much about it.
I was pretty young during that election I didn't care to much about it.
This post was edited on 10/23/14 at 8:16 am
Posted on 10/23/14 at 12:30 pm to FT
Interesting thread idea hope I learn from it
From my basic knowledge of the situation my opinion is there is no way to know which one won. Say what you want about Bush but thank the good Lord Gore didn't win
What a disaster that would've been
ETA: by "won" I mean won the popular vote in the state of Florida
From my basic knowledge of the situation my opinion is there is no way to know which one won. Say what you want about Bush but thank the good Lord Gore didn't win
What a disaster that would've been
ETA: by "won" I mean won the popular vote in the state of Florida
This post was edited on 10/23/14 at 12:36 pm
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)