Started By
Message

re: It's 2000; What are you arguing here regarding who won Florida?

Posted on 10/23/14 at 7:28 am to
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
84961 posts
Posted on 10/23/14 at 7:28 am to
amazing to me that the "cut spending" types would still want Bush over Gore considering that the former took over a budget surplus and promptly flushed it down the toilet and then proceeded to tear through a TRILLION dollars getting revenge on Saddam for trying to kill his daddy.
Posted by Tiger n Miami AU83
Miami
Member since Oct 2007
45656 posts
Posted on 10/23/14 at 7:35 am to
quote:

Ultimately, a media consortium—comprising the New York Times, Washington Post, Wall Street Journal, Tribune Co. (parent of the Los Angeles Times), Associated Press, CNN, Palm Beach Post and St. Petersburg Times[65]—hired the National Opinion Research Center at the University of Chicago[66] to examine 175,010 ballots that were collected from the entire state, not just the disputed counties that were discounted; these ballots contained undervotes (votes with no choice made for president) and overvotes (votes made with more than one choice marked). Their goal was to determine the reliability and accuracy of the systems used for the voting process. The NORC concluded that if the disputes over the validity of all the ballots statewide in question had been consistently resolved and any uniform standard applied, the electoral result would have been reversed and Gore would have won by 107–115 votes if only two of the three coders had to agree on the ballot. When counting ballots wherein all three coders agreed, Gore would have won the most restrictive scenario by 127 votes and Bush would have won the most inclusive scenario by 110 votes. Inclusive in media reporting likely refers to including the undervotes (only) as these people were then included in the vote. Whether overvotes were truly nullified in counts is not known.[67]

Subsequent analyses cast further doubt on conclusions that Bush likely would have won anyway, had the U.S. Supreme Court not intervened. An analysis of the NORC data by University of Pennsylvania researcher Steven F. Freeman and journalist Joel Bleifuss concluded that a recount of all uncounted votes using any standard (inclusive, strict, statewide or county by county), Gore would have been the victor.



LINK
This post was edited on 10/23/14 at 7:37 am
Posted by McLemore
Member since Dec 2003
31650 posts
Posted on 10/23/14 at 8:08 am to
It was either a giant douche or a shite sandwich.
Posted by catholictigerfan
Member since Oct 2009
56333 posts
Posted on 10/23/14 at 8:15 am to
who ever had the most votes.

I was pretty young during that election I didn't care to much about it.
This post was edited on 10/23/14 at 8:16 am
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
99845 posts
Posted on 10/23/14 at 9:30 am to
Bush won, period.
Posted by Wishnitwas1998
where TN, MS, and AL meet
Member since Oct 2010
58488 posts
Posted on 10/23/14 at 12:30 pm to
Interesting thread idea hope I learn from it

From my basic knowledge of the situation my opinion is there is no way to know which one won. Say what you want about Bush but thank the good Lord Gore didn't win

What a disaster that would've been

ETA: by "won" I mean won the popular vote in the state of Florida
This post was edited on 10/23/14 at 12:36 pm
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram