Started By
Message

re: Podcast listeners: Check out the new Podcast "Serial"

Posted on 11/11/14 at 8:06 pm to
Posted by Pettifogger
Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone
Member since Feb 2012
79384 posts
Posted on 11/11/14 at 8:06 pm to
I just recently concluded he's guilty.

In one comment, when explaining why he's frustrated at his conviction, he says something along the lines of "I mean, maybe if it was a crime of passion, or if there was other evidence, like if she had fought back or something...."

He would rationalize that away saying he was referencing a situation in which she fought back and there was DNA evidence. But the way he said it stuck out to me immediately.
Posted by barry
Location, Location, Location
Member since Aug 2006
50376 posts
Posted on 11/11/14 at 8:11 pm to
I think he said that because its so frustrating that there is no evidence and he still got convicted. Like he's losing hope because they already convicted him with such little evidence that how could be possibly get it overturned now.

I thought him getting mad about people saying he was too nice to do the crime because him being a nice guy won't get his conviction over turned. Made me think he's innocent.
Posted by hendersonshands
Univ. of Louisiana Ragin Cajuns
Member since Oct 2007
160105 posts
Posted on 11/11/14 at 8:11 pm to
He seems very calm about it, almost like he's just chatting about someone else. I'm not sure what that means. Is he a sociopath? Has he had enough time in jail to where he's just more interested in facts rather than emotional arguments? I don't know, it's weird. I can't really put myself in his shoes.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram