- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 11/11/14 at 8:06 pm to hendersonshands
I just recently concluded he's guilty.
In one comment, when explaining why he's frustrated at his conviction, he says something along the lines of "I mean, maybe if it was a crime of passion, or if there was other evidence, like if she had fought back or something...."
He would rationalize that away saying he was referencing a situation in which she fought back and there was DNA evidence. But the way he said it stuck out to me immediately.
In one comment, when explaining why he's frustrated at his conviction, he says something along the lines of "I mean, maybe if it was a crime of passion, or if there was other evidence, like if she had fought back or something...."
He would rationalize that away saying he was referencing a situation in which she fought back and there was DNA evidence. But the way he said it stuck out to me immediately.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News