Started By
Message

re: US troops, during Iraq War, encountered and were wounded by chemical weapons

Posted on 10/14/14 at 9:33 pm to
Posted by Tigah in the ATL
Atlanta
Member since Feb 2005
27539 posts
Posted on 10/14/14 at 9:33 pm to
nothing was covered up.

We know there were old chemical weapons.

This does not mean Saddam had WMDs he could use.
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
65147 posts
Posted on 10/14/14 at 9:37 pm to
quote:

This does not mean Saddam had WMDs he could use.



Apparently he could use them as U.S. troops were "wounded" by them. Just because you don't have a delivery system for them doesn't mean you can't use them on the Kurds.



Posted by Choctaw
Pumpin' Sunshine
Member since Jul 2007
77774 posts
Posted on 10/14/14 at 9:38 pm to
quote:

This does not mean Saddam had WMDs he could use.



it doesn't...but he did
Posted by WeeWee
Member since Aug 2012
40255 posts
Posted on 10/14/14 at 9:51 pm to
quote:

nothing was covered up.

We know there were old chemical weapons.


Bush lied, troops died

quote:

his does not mean Saddam had WMDs he could use.


How do you know? Do you have access to all the classified info?


to the OP, is this legit?
Posted by S.E.C. Crazy
Alabama
Member since Feb 2013
7905 posts
Posted on 10/15/14 at 1:09 am to
Saddam didn't need to have WMDs, he violated his cease fire.

But his top general said he did have WMDs, but they were moved to Syria.

Anyone that thinks Saddam didn't have chemical weapons is dealing in the underworld of naivety.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram