- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Is The Advocate serious with this article?
Posted on 10/3/14 at 11:30 am to CheerWhine
Posted on 10/3/14 at 11:30 am to CheerWhine
quote:
Good stuff, but I noticed they left out UNC for some reason. No idea why.
The NYT article mentions that UNC isn't the top team in any Zip Code.
And North Carolina doesn't control even a single ZIP code. They instead yield to Duke, North Carolina State, Wake Forest and East Carolina, even though none are a football powerhouse.
Although I clicked around the state a little and I find it hard to believe that UNC isn't in the top 3 anywhere in North Carolina.
2
Posted on 10/3/14 at 11:49 am to deSandman
Working in Meridian, MS. Besides being a garhole of a town, more Bama stuff than anything else. I see Bama, State, USM, then Ole Miss. Alot of Juco stuff too. Weird to here the Juco call in show after Feinbaum.
Posted on 10/3/14 at 12:05 pm to deSandman
quote:
The NYT article mentions that UNC isn't the top team in any Zip Code.
And North Carolina doesn't control even a single ZIP code. They instead yield to Duke, North Carolina State, Wake Forest and East Carolina, even though none are a football powerhouse.
I grew up in North Carolina and UNC is definitely the dominant program in the state. Looking at Orange County, NC (where UNC is located), the top team is Duke at 19.8%. The only way that makes ANY sense is if UNC was specifically excluded from the results.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News