- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Blood on Obama's hands? Child dies. Infected by illegals?
Posted on 11/2/14 at 7:34 pm to BamaAtl
Posted on 11/2/14 at 7:34 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
I understand that you don't read scientific studies for a living, but some of us do
Yay.
So can you tell me how it's relevant that in early 2013 the whole world had the same % of of HRV detection proportions when the issue we are discussing is the planting of a a large number of potentially sick kids in direct contact with previously unstick American kids?
I get your study.. but it's fools gold - it has zero relevance to this thread.
Oh, and your study did not even mention Guatemala, which is the country of origin that is the focus of the discussion in America in regards to most of these sick kids here.
There's links out there if you want to find them.
1
Posted on 11/2/14 at 7:38 pm to Meauxjeaux
Post one link of a peer-reviewed study sowing Guatemala has a higher prevalence rate of enterovirus d-68 than surrounding countries, and we'll have a start. Show that Guatemalans specifically were going to the cities/states where the North American enterovirus D-68 outbreak(s) occurred and you'll start to get some proof.
It's relevant because it shows that the rate of HRV detected by their study was comparable to other studies in other locations, and the rate of EV-D68 among those cases was also comparable (and low). Otherwise you could (rightfully) claim that their low detection rate of the current outbreak-causing organism was due to improper case finding, and call their results into question.
The point, again, is that there was no "planting of a large number of potentially sick kids in direct contact with previously unsick American kids" - at least, not that any data support. The immigrant children and American children previously had enterovirus D-68 at the same rate.
It's relevant because it shows that the rate of HRV detected by their study was comparable to other studies in other locations, and the rate of EV-D68 among those cases was also comparable (and low). Otherwise you could (rightfully) claim that their low detection rate of the current outbreak-causing organism was due to improper case finding, and call their results into question.
The point, again, is that there was no "planting of a large number of potentially sick kids in direct contact with previously unsick American kids" - at least, not that any data support. The immigrant children and American children previously had enterovirus D-68 at the same rate.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News