Started By
Message

re: "Half the schools are below average" - not always true

Posted on 10/1/14 at 10:08 am to
Posted by SpidermanTUba
my house
Member since May 2004
36128 posts
Posted on 10/1/14 at 10:08 am to
quote:


Well since the normal distribution is the the most commonly occurring distribution and not the only distribution that the mean is a measure of central tendency and the expected value, then it is often true. So generally is an appropriate description.


Actually nature is usually more skewed than normal. The stock market learned that the hard way in 1987. Simply presuming a normal distribution without evidence is a serious folly.


Posted by CptBengal
BR Baby
Member since Dec 2007
71661 posts
Posted on 10/1/14 at 10:12 am to
quote:

Simply presuming a normal distribution without evidence is a serious folly.


You do know that there are many other distributions than the normal with the mean as the central measure, right?

You also know that many of these distributions are not symmetrical or unimodal, right?

Of course you did
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35243 posts
Posted on 10/1/14 at 5:23 pm to
quote:

Actually nature is usually more skewed than normal. The stock market learned that the hard way in 1987. Simply presuming a normal distribution without evidence is a serious folly.


Look I think The Black Swan is a great book as you seem to be using Taleb's argument, but you're misapplying his argument. He differentiated between that do not have an underlying normal distribution, and instead have fatter tails due to extreme, disproportionate outliers and variables that do have an underlying distribution. Test scores would fall in the latter groups for a number of reasons that I explained in an earlier post.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram