Started By
Message

re: 'Prayer Baby' drowns in church's baptism tank

Posted on 9/25/14 at 4:15 pm to
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
65019 posts
Posted on 9/25/14 at 4:15 pm to
quote:

Darth, it is clear you do not understand civil law and the doctrine of attractive nuisance, which is why I call you ignorant. You have displayed much ignorance in is thread, I have not.




You claim to know civil law and yet based on nothing but what you yourself have admitted to "assumptions" you have already tried and found negligence on the part of this church.

quote:

You're one of those guys that wants to talk about the way you think the world should spin; personal responsibility of the family, blah, and blah. I'm here telling you how it does spin, and your retort is to say things that simply are not true -- that is the mark of an ignorant man. We are on page five and nobody has offered a logical conclusion as to how the kid could drown in this if it were properly secured. One poster even said every church he has been inside has them drained when not in use.

By your measure, nobody should ever discuss anything until one hundred percent of the facts have been obtained. I do see that as the standard on his board.



And here you are again , and still the only retort to anything that does not agree with you is to claim those who do not agree with you are "ignorant". It's obvious you lack the ability to debate so I'm done with you.

This post was edited on 9/25/14 at 4:16 pm
Posted by The Third Leg
Idiot Out Wandering Around
Member since May 2014
10059 posts
Posted on 9/25/14 at 4:17 pm to
I'll remember this one, Darth. You keep searching for those coherent thoughts, and I'll keep being reasonable.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram