re: 'Prayer Baby' drowns in church's baptism tank

quote:

---

According to this story, a logical person would assume the child accessed on it's own accord when it was separated from his sister. I am giving the family and humanity the benefit of the doubt, and assuming they didn't toss the baby in the tank for a few laps.

Your last part is a further illustration of your ignorance.

---

Once again you're assuming. Also, the fact you don't realize that you should never allow a 22 month old to become "separated" from whomever is responsible for the child only goes to illustrate your own ignorance. The fact of the matter is, when in charge of a 22 month old child, it's up to YOU to make sure YOU do not become separated from said child. The child's parents were responsible for allowing their teen daughter to supervise this child. That much I know for FACT. As to the Church's responsibility, until we know what measures were taken (or not taken) to secure this pool, we cannot say what, if any, responsibility they have in this matter. The church very well may have some or even all responsibility here, but as things stand now based on what information we have here, there is no way for us to know if that's the case.

A FWIW, I've debated a lot of people on here and you rank perhaps on the dead bottom of that list. The only comeback you have to anyone who does not agree with you is to call them ignorant.