- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: What should the USA have done after 11 September 2001?
Posted on 9/11/14 at 10:25 pm to Champagne
Posted on 9/11/14 at 10:25 pm to Champagne
quote:
You and your fellow travelers will Blame Bush forever because it's a useful weapon to use against your political opponents. It's no longer persuasive.
For Iraq...given that he invaded them for no other reason other then he felt like kicking some arse.
Yeah...I will blame him for everything that goes on in that shite hole of a country because he is to blame.
His post 9/11 policy certainly hamstrung Obama (who frankly didn't need the help fricking up in international affairs) and it will continue to hamstring the next president.
But hey, stick to your narrative.
2
Posted on 9/12/14 at 7:11 am to asurob1
quote:
Yeah...I will blame him for everything that goes on in that shite hole of a country because he is to blame.
I'll stick to the rational objective truth, and YOU stick to your infantile inability to conduct rational objective analysis in the part of your brain that operates logical functioning.
Posted on 9/12/14 at 10:12 am to asurob1
quote:
For Iraq...given that he invaded them for no other reason other then he felt like kicking some arse.
Well, that, and the whole, Saddam was a threat to regional stability (not an agent of it, as widely alleged by Hussein apologists of the American left), evidenced by his not one, but TWO invasions of his neighbors in a 10-year span, and continued assholiness.
The argument that he was contained may have some weight, but that doesn't mean he should have been left with a powerful military, indefinitely. The argument that he turned out not to have the robust WMD program that even he thought he had, much less than every reputable intelligence agency on Earth, thought he had (I guess we should have consulted with aliens), doesn't hold much sway with me.
You want to say we prosecuted the war badly? I agree. You want to say there was no justification for it? You're full of $hit.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News