Started By
Message

re: Labor force participation drops to 62.8%, lowest since Carter administration

Posted on 9/6/14 at 11:52 am to
Posted by EthanL
Auburn,AL
Member since Oct 2011
6963 posts
Posted on 9/6/14 at 11:52 am to
quote:

No, it's like saying we won 55-0 with only 10 ten men on the field. However, considering the participation rate thingy, if we keep putting less men on the field each game guess what finally happens?


God. Why would you do this to yourself.

My point was that there are too many good economic indicators right now, to take one seemingly 'bad' one and make hay out of it. If that's what it takes to be a rank-and-file Satan to any good news, it's going to be a sad life I guess
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
48801 posts
Posted on 9/6/14 at 11:53 am to
What are some of these many good economic indicators? Are you under the impression participation rate is an irrelevant number?
This post was edited on 9/6/14 at 11:53 am
Posted by Homesick Tiger
Greenbrier, AR
Member since Nov 2006
54239 posts
Posted on 9/6/14 at 12:22 pm to
quote:

Why would you do this to yourself.


You can't comprehend that if we keep putting less men on the field we eventually get our arse stomped? You can't comprehend that if less people are working that eventually we will get our arse kicked economically?

You look at the little(immediate)picture of things. A person with common sense looks at the big picture down the road. You guys on the left are the credit card of American economics. Spend now, worry about paying it back later.

Good luck with that shite.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram