- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Leonard Fournette Hype
Posted on 9/2/14 at 4:06 pm to monsterballads
Posted on 9/2/14 at 4:06 pm to monsterballads
quote:
adrian peterson couldn't have run through the amount of defenders in front of fournette saturday night in the 1st half.
Fournette is better than Peterson, remember?
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/Iconrolleyes.gif)
Posted on 9/2/14 at 4:08 pm to LSUGrad9295
my point is there wasn't much room for LF to run in the first half saturday night. the line wasn't exactly opening anything up for him.
one thing I did notice though was he could have cut it to the left near the goal line on one series and just about walked in. he'll learn from his first game.
jeremy hill didn't see the field until his third game fwiw
one thing I did notice though was he could have cut it to the left near the goal line on one series and just about walked in. he'll learn from his first game.
jeremy hill didn't see the field until his third game fwiw
Posted on 9/2/14 at 6:51 pm to LSUGrad9295
quote:
Fournette is better than Peterson, remember?
Why lie to make your point? I guarantee you can't link one person making that statement.
It seems there is a segment of LSU's fan base who revel in what they deem a failure of some of LSU's players. But that is true in real life as well. Normally those who are not high achievers themselves hope for the failure of those who are.
The Leonard Fournett hype was well earned by him. And it will be based on his full career at LSU, not one game where he was running against 9 in the box. Anyone concluding the hype is not warranted after one game, especially that game where the deck was stacked against any RB, was already predisposed to believe the hype wasn't warranted. They just needed something to support their position. They probably have argued to anyone who would listen that he will never live up to the hype.
I didn't see anything in that game that negated LF becoming all he was hyped to be. The same with Brandon Harris. Now if I was looking to argue he will be a bust, this one game is all I would need. Then it's "see I told ya!" It's all a matter of perspective.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)